Talk:International Association of Fire Fighters

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Firefighting

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firefighting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to firefighting on Wikipedia! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.FirefightingWikipedia:WikiProject FirefightingTemplate:WikiProject FirefightingFirefighting articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Giuliani stuff POV

Sorry, Rudy has made rebuttals that should be noted. It appears that the IAFF President is an active Democrat, also unclear if Rudy declined to attend before or after the union began criticizing him... (This unsigned comment left by 66.72.215.225 (talk · contribs) 17:10, 12 July 2007) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.124.211.217 (talk) 22:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.124.211.217 (talk) 23:00, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Population protection Career vs Volunteer

Please stop editing the percentage of population protection. The correct % is 62 career 38 volunteer. The percentage being interjected is accurate of the % of career dept's vs volunteer in the country, not the % of population protected! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JTomo170 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like a promotion for the IAFF

This article appears to have been written by a person or persons working for the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF). It reads as if it has been lifted straight from the IAFF homepage. It is not an objective, disinterested, encyclopaedic article. Because it fails the test of objectivity, it needs a complete overhaul by a team of editors who are not members of or paid by the IAFF.124.177.118.17 (talk) 11:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on International Association of Fire Fighters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080306202233/http://www.iaff.org/ to http://www.iaff.org/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080306202233/http://www.iaff.org/ to http://www.iaff.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International Association of Fire Fighters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061119202906/http://www.iaff.org/06convention/resolutions.aspx to http://www.iaff.org/06convention/Resolutions.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:01, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Opinions of the IAFF, not information

This page appears to be a political support tool for the IAFF. The edits seem to only support the agenda of the IAFF and its membership instead of providing meaningful, unbiased and accurate information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redbarron1957 (talk • contribs) 04:25, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To resolve issues of perceived bias, it is required to provide specific information on what statements are disputed, and for what reason.-- Theoprakt (talk) 00:02, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that's not how Wikipedia works. You can't just "drive by", slap a bunch of dispute and maintenance tags on a page, and then never be heard of again. In lack of a proper discussion I am removing the tags. -- Theoprakt (talk) 12:22, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And am I suppose to talk to myself? Redbarron1957 (talk) 03:58, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]