Talk:Intercolonial Railway

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Trains Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Old untitled posts

The June 8 edit on the secret history of the Intercolonial is pretty steeped in POV and is completely unsourced. It reads more like a conspiracy theory about Canadian Confederation. Every historian of the Atlantic region has discussed the military and economic motivation for a railway between the Maritimes and Central Canada. I am also unaware of any reference to a massive loss of life connected to the construction of the ICR.Letterofmarque (talk) 03:01, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited down the unsourced POV about the BNA money laundering conspiracy but, in the spirit of different points of view, left the claim in as a theory, but unless it is given a source it should be removed entirelyLetterofmarque (talk) 01:48, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wat m8

in herald and reporting marks part it says that the reporting mark was changed from ICR to ICR? what the heck — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.118.136.134 (talk) 19:41, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]