Talk:Interactome
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Interactome article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Disclaimer: I am not a biologist. It seems implicit in this page that an Interactome, perhaps like a genome, is a body of information about some particular species. If so this should be made explicit.
If this is so the following question is begged:
If protein X impacts protein Y in species A, why does it not impact it in species B?
Hopefully there is a short list of such known or proposed mechanisms and the list should be mentioned. I have recently heard a theory, whose name I have forgotten, that introns in the DNA (near the expressor gene of the impacted protein) may control such impact and thus are interactomes inherited.
76.220.201.192 (talk) 02:55, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Yes agreed 76.220.201.192 biology is of course not limited to PPIs ( Protein- Protein interactions ). The genome only represents proteins , but these proteins represent information about the environment ; so why are PPIs necessarily more important than this other information BillO'Slatter (talk) 03:51, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Genetic interaction networks confusion?
[edit]The third paragraph of this section talks about "the interactome" as if there were only one. It talks about "it" being incomplete as of October 2010. But the paragraph never describes WHAT interactome it's referring to. I originally thought that it was referring to the interactome in the prior paragraph related to Budding yeast, but that's not very clear. And, given that the paragraph has only one citation (that doesn't work), I can't really find a way back to the original source material. SeanAhern (talk) 17:53, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
The same thing is true of the "Using the interactome" section. It also talks about "the interactome" as if there were only one. At first, I assumed that it was talking about the complete interactome of the human body. But the source material (at least the first one) talks about yeast. How should we clarify this? SeanAhern (talk) 17:53, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- Resurrecting an old comment here as I've resolved the issue for now by moving the content. Even the cited material refers to the interactome more frequently than interactomes in the plural, much in the same way that "the genome" was used in the earlier days of genomics. There will always be multiple interactomes and even multiple interpretations of the same interactome so this article should never refer to the definitive, singular interactome. JHCaufield - talk - 17:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, your edit helps. SeanAhern (talk) 13:33, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Interactome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111004173202/http://protinfo.compbio.washington.edu/ppc/ to http://protinfo.compbio.washington.edu/ppc/
- Added archive https://archive.is/20121228183041/http://bioverse.compbio.washington.edu/ to http://bioverse.compbio.washington.edu/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:25, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Term not used by any source other than the authors of the article; at most, it should be mentioned as a suggested term at interactome. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 15:43, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- Agreed, done! Amkilpatrick (talk) 16:08, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- C-Class Molecular Biology articles
- Unknown-importance Molecular Biology articles
- C-Class MCB articles
- Mid-importance MCB articles
- WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology articles
- C-Class Computational Biology articles
- Mid-importance Computational Biology articles
- WikiProject Computational Biology articles
- All WikiProject Molecular Biology pages