Talk:Intelligence engine
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
When considering creation of this article, I initially didn't think it was different enough from other BI tools, data warehouse appliances and/or wasn't a new form of AI so it wasn't a good candidate. I also wasn't sure the piece would be on the trailing edge of the concept rather than the leading edge. A few things made it clear to me that the concept warranted a new page:
- I saw the phrase "Intelligence Engine" (independent of "Artificial intelligence") being used and patented as far back as 2001
- If it's a concept being used and I'm confused about it, wouldn't it help to author content to clarify what it is to others?
- It is a concept that updates/make sense of existing content like business intelligence tools, Supply chain management 2.0 (SCM 2.0) and Attivio
- Intelligence Engines differ from other forms of data management/BI in that an intelligence engine is the aggregation of those BI concepts/tools (like the platform, the distribution layer, the data mining layer, the business rules, etc.) but one that is predictive and is founded on industry/problem-specific human intelligence.
The only thing I didn't get into that may be helpful is how intelligence engines relate to AI. AI is turning into SaaS. I avoided it because that idea is more leading edge than trailing.
Jclayc (talk) 14:59, 3 August 2016 (UTC)COI disclosure: KPMG is a client of the marketing agency where I work.
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. Edits made by the below user(s) were last checked for neutrality on 12-09-2016 by David.moreno72. |