Talk:Integration using Euler's formula
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Misleading title?
[edit]The title of this article seems misleading, since the term integration using complex analysis would usually be construed as meaning things like the residue calculus. Michael Hardy (talk) 15:15, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- What do you think about the title "Complexifying the integral"? This is the terminology used by Prof. Mattuck of MIT [1] Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 19:48, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
'extremely tedious' simply not true
[edit]It is just as straightforward to solve the 2nd integral using trig identities, no more than 3 lines of working using a total of 2 trig identities.
'extremely tedious' is in fact, extremely misleading — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikidness69 (talk • contribs) 05:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Copied and pasted from another site
[edit]Seems like most if the stuff has been simply copied and pasted from this site: https://handwiki.org/wiki/Integration_using_Euler%27s_formula#:~:text=In%20integral%20calculus%2C%20Euler's%20formula,i%20x%20and%20then%20integrated.
Please confirm Uddhav9 (talk) 15:31, 30 October 2021 (UTC)