Talk:Insufficient justification
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Conclusion Section
[edit]Have removed the conclusion section. The article reads like an essay and is not appropriate for wiki, honestly I think someone has uploaded their assignment for this one. The conclusion contained no citations, instead summarising the article and highlighting the value of the subject. Given the style of the section, lack of citations, and the overall tone of the article, it is reasonable to assume that the conclusion is original research, and it may be necessary for a more in depth review of the article as a whole. Editor/123 11:37, 20 October 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ben8142 (talk • contribs)
Original article, including conclusion, created by SocPsy321, no user activity since. Most of their work has been edited out and the original reads like a mediocre secondary school assignment. Seems like a lot of original research, assuming the deletion is uncontroversial. Editor/123 11:48, 20 October 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ben8142 (talk • contribs)
i think in the first two sentences there is something not completely correct. 143.177.236.105 (talk) 22:04, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Adult Development winter 2024
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2024 and 20 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Trekyncc1701 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Trekyncc1701 (talk) 00:33, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
While I agree that the tone could use some improvement, I believe that the content sufficiently describes the topic and provides helpful context regarding the origin, the development, and the experiments. Trekyncc1701 (talk) 00:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)