Talk:Instruction path length

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Untitled

With many computer architectures, two different machine instructions may require different time for execution. E.g. an ADD machine instruction (addition) may take only 1 cycle, while an SQRT machine instruction (square root) may take several hundred cycles.

My question therefore is how at all instruction path length can be deemed a measure of the algorithms performance on a particular computer hardware? At least drawbacks of using IPL as a measure should be mentioned in this article. --Abdull (talk) 12:18, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"order of items in unsorted lookup list - most frequently occurring items should be placed first to avoid long searches" Isn't this a form of sorting? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.68.32.159 (talk) 16:06, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]