Talk:Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy

After reading about a study published by this group, I wanted to look them up to learn about possible conflicts of interest vis-a-vis that study. Ironically enough, the main author of this article is the selfsame organization, and while not heavily slanted, the article reads like little more than a mission statement. If more proof need be rendered, User:Iatpiatp's personal page is, again, the same article verbatim. --68.192.170.165 (talk) 02:08, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Commens fro feed

References are the most important, especially those that show outside iterest in the company, so newspaper articles etc (most companies will have at least local coverage). I would restructure the article too, put Areas of work into the lead instead of a seperate section - it is the most iportant thing an ignorant reader like me wants to know. The move history to be the first section, with time line a subsection (using 3 === instead of 2) of that. Timelines like this are rarely seen as good writing, so re-writing as prose paragrpahs might be an improvment.

Assuming you work there, can you get a photo of the offices released into public domain? Also if the company has a logo, this can be uploaded as fair use (ask at my talk page if you are unsure of image uploading).

I wouldn't worry too much about conflict of interest, as long as you try to write it as neutral as possible, and listen if other editors think some parts are to praising.Yobmod (talk) 14:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)