Talk:Institut für Sexualwissenschaft

Institut für Sexualwissenschaft was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 28, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
September 4, 2008	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Germany Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Mid‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 February 2021 and 16 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JTatreau.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2020 and 2 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kaifloresb. Peer reviewers: Slominski, Atorres19, Spatel137, Dsilvas3.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA nomination on hold

I think this is a well written and well-refenced article. And I would be ready to promote this article to Good Article status once a few style-related bits are tidied up:

You should expand your lead paragraph, have a look at WP:LEAD for guidelines on that. Basically you should summarize your article a bit more.

Fixed - Davodd 23:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The topmost image needs a caption.

Fixed. Davodd 23:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Notes section only contains one item and it is not referenced explicitly by anything in the text. Perhaps it needs to be moved into the Futher reading section.

Fixed. Davodd 23:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are over-linking some terms like Nazi and Berlin. Ideally you should just link one instance of occurances of these terms and only link subsequent occurances if they occur much futher in the text. (I will see if I can fix this one up myself actually)

Fixed. Davodd 23:14, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--Konstable 03:06, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job. I have promoted the article.--Konstable 10:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, I must say I am quite surprised by this promotion. This is surely a good attempt at this important topic, but I guess the GA standards should be higher. First of all, this article seems more like "Fates of the Institut für Sexualwissenschaft in the Nazi era", with a rather elaborate introduction. The section dealing with the work of the Institute before 1933 seems quite underdeveloped and stubby - I get the impression they didn't actually do much and the only thing that is important is that they were persecuted by the Nazis.

Moreover, only a few paragraphs and sentences are referenced while the entire article should. Of more minor flaws, I noticed that the Deutsche Studentenschaft is neither explained nor wikilinked - please make sure the article is entirely accessible to people not familiar with this period in German history.

I know this is quite a lot, but I think we must preserve the high standards for GAs. Therefore, I would like to kindly ask you to expand this article, making sure it is up to all of WP:WIAGA guidelines, or I will feel compelled to delist it. Bravada, talk - 11:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the above. I can't see how this article meets GA standards. Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 17:04, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested Edits

I noticed this article is a bit lacking in information on the institute and its practices from before 1933. A lot of studies were conducted there, for better or worse, on homosexuality, its causes, potential cures/treatments, and even on eugenics. I propose the addition of sections discussing experiments and the work done towards the understanding and categorization of homosexuality, such as Hirschfeld's doctrine of "sexual intermediacy" which was essentially an early version of today's understanding of gender and sexuality as spectrums. In total, these edits would probably add around 200-300 words to the article. The main source I intend to pull from is cited below.^[1] If you have any suggestions or feedback on this, please let me know either here or on my talk page! Thanks! – JTatreau (talk) 21:19, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Dose, Ralf (2014). Magnus Hirschfeld and the origins of the gay liberation movement. New York. pp. 68–78. ISBN 9781583674383.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)

[1] Dose, Ralf (2014). Magnus Hirschfeld and the origins of the gay liberation movement. New York. pp. 68–78. ISBN 9781583674383.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)

[1]