Talk:Instinct (Orphan Black)

Instinct (Orphan Black) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 17, 2015. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Instinct (Orphan Black) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 February 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that for the Orphan Black episode "Instinct", the show's own writing offices were used as a filming location?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Instinct (Orphan Black).

Wikipedia

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Instinct (Orphan Black)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 12:40, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grabbing this one for a review over the next couple of days. Miyagawa (talk) 12:40, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry for the delay in reviewing. I'll do it now.

General

Resolved

No duplicate links. Miyagawa (talk) 12:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Dup detector clear. Miyagawa (talk) 12:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Resolved

None to check. Miyagawa (talk) 12:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Resolved

Ok. Miyagawa (talk) 12:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Resolved

Worth adding that it was the first episode to combine shots of Maslany as multiple characters in the same shot. That's a fairly important first for the series. Miyagawa (talk) 12:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely – added. 97198 (talk) 05:38, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

Resolved

Ok. Miyagawa (talk) 12:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Production

Resolved

It would be worthwhile moving the mention of Fawcett being the co-creator of the series up to the first mention in the paragraph. Miyagawa (talk) 12:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. 97198 (talk) 05:38, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

Resolved

No viewing figures? Miyagawa (talk) 12:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately this is the only episode of the series that I or another editor has been unable to find figures for. 97198 (talk) 05:38, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I have a similar problem with some of the episode articles I've worked on. Miyagawa (talk) 12:59, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Has season one come out on DVD/Blu-ray yet? It'd be worthwhile making a mention of the home media release of this episode (which I presume would only be as part of the season sets). Miyagawa (talk) 12:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the season has been released on DVD but I'm not sure I'll be able to find any sources that mention this episode specifically – is that okay? And would this info fit in the reception section? 97198 (talk) 05:38, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I wouldn't say it was worthwhile adding a line about the season release after second thoughts - that'd go in the relevent season article. Miyagawa (talk) 12:59, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Resolved

Ok. Miyagawa (talk) 12:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All looking good without a great deal of work to have this reach GA. Outside of the review, have you thought of creating an indexing template box? What I mean is something like this: Template:The Big Bang Theory. Miyagawa (talk) 12:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Miyagawa: Thanks for your prompt review! I've made some changes from your suggestions and have left a query above. I haven't made a template since there are only three episodes with articles as yet – perhaps down the line when the template wouldn't look so empty? 97198 (talk) 05:38, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, that's perfectly understandable. Happy to promote. Miyagawa (talk) 12:59, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! 97198 (talk) 21:59, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]