Talk:Insider investment strategy
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Article is based on unreliable, promotional sources
[edit]Only 2 sources are cited for the information about the topic [I.E. not including the list of studies which contains no information about the topic], both of which are self-published, promotional, and unreliable sources. The second paragraph of the lead is practically an ad (including links to the sites), especially given that the article states this to be a "proven theory" without any dissenting opinion. (If such was the case, there would be more than just 2 no-name funds following it). - Yaakovaryeh (talk) 06:37, 1 May 2022 (UTC)