Talk:Inkanyamba
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Inkanyamba article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Generally Bad Article
[edit]This article is terrible. Seems to be taken from two websites with flawed information. Had to change region of howick falls in the article (not in cape town) and further more feel that some of the language used could be seen as slightly colonial and generally offensive.
Will look for an old book I have on SA myths and monsters but if anyone actually reads this, please do something. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Padness (talk • contribs) 02:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC).
Tone
[edit]I've edited the article to improve the tone and am considering removing the template. I don't think that anyone is active in maintaining this article but if you have anything to say in regards to it's removal I'll wait for a couple of days Padness 15:20, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- Stub-Class South Africa articles
- Mid-importance South Africa articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in South Africa
- WikiProject South Africa articles
- Stub-Class Mythology articles
- Low-importance Mythology articles
- Wikipedia requested images of mythology subjects
- Stub-Class paranormal articles
- Unknown-importance paranormal articles
- WikiProject Paranormal articles
- Stub-Class Cryptids articles
- Unknown-importance Cryptids articles
- Wikipedia requested images of cryptozoology
- WikiProject Cryptozoology articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press