Talk:Initial events of the Rwandan genocide

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rwanda (assessed as High-importance).

Triggering of the first massacres starting at sunrise on 7 April 1994
[edit]
In a few hours the Presidential Guard and the Interahamwe militiamen had started fighting in Kigali and in certain other regions of Rwanda, especially in the North West. Even if the attacks were not organized beforehand, it appears that for all Rwandans, the initial attacks signified a strong and unambiguous signal. Those who were going to kill knew what they needed to do, and the Tutsis and moderate Hutus understood immediately that they were going to be attacked.

I commented the above out of the first section of the page. Can anybody think of a good way to revise it? I feel like it's in need of serious work. —CrazyDrumGuy 18:26, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone indicate how many Hutus, moderate or otherwise were killed this seems important. Theuth —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.22.11.245 (talk) 22:32, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Initial events of the Rwandan Genocide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628035421/http://warcrimes.foreignpolicyblogs.com/category/uncategorized/rwanda/ to http://warcrimes.foreignpolicyblogs.com/category/uncategorized/rwanda/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Choking on their own genitalia"

This is the most extreme version of several different accounts of how exactly the Belgians died. In fact they defended themselves for several hours with captured weapons before being killed, and other sources indicate they were killed in combat either by hand grenades or by machetes in close quarters. The Peterson quote about cutting tendons and gagging on penises ought to be qualified somehow in this and other articles where it is referenced.69.140.1.172 (talk) 17:14, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence this happened. All investigations, court documents and witness accounts contradict the authors story. This story by author has also become the primary talking point about the genocide. Why is the 10 Belgium solders death in manor contradictory to all evidence so much more important and prominent on Wikipedia than the genocide of hundreds of thousands of Africans? BevoLJ (talk) 23:52, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will remove and replace with actual UN/ICC documentation until I can learn how to find an admin to review the page. BevoLJ (talk) 23:56, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]