Talk:Inelastic scattering
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
‹See TfM›
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Different terminologies
[edit]The definition given is the correct one for chemistry and condensed matter, but not for particle physics. In particle physics you will call it elastic scattering even if the incident and the scattered particle has different energy. It is only inelastic if the total energy of the particles involved in the scattering process is not conserved, for example if there is pair-production or annihilations.
Example: From the chemistry point of view, Compton scattering is an inelastic process, because the photon loses (gains) energy when it scatter on the electron, but from the particle physics point of view (or terminologi) it is called an elastic process, because the total energi is conserved. 130.225.29.254 (talk) 14:06, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Inelastic vs. Elastic scattering ratios
[edit]When an electron is the incident particle, the probability of inelastic scattering, depending on the energy of the incident electron, is usually smaller than that of elastic scattering.
This is not accurate. The ratio of elastic to inelastic scattering changes based on atomic number. See https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2210370237 figure 1. I will try to rectify that paragraph later on. Niashervin (talk) 02:39, 10 September 2024 (UTC)