Jump to content

Talk:Industry Federation of the State of Rio de Janeiro

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page should not be speedy deleted because...

[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... it is about a Brazilian enterprise and portrays who it is (introduction), what it does (operation), in what it is involved (union trade movement) and how it was born (history). That does not go against WP policies. Anyway, I will try to rephrase some parts of it in order to make the text more adequated. --Sistema Firjan (talk) 12:43, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For further information, see comments on this page. --Sistema Firjan (talk) 12:49, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Industry Federation of the State of Rio de Janeiro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]