Talk:Indolence

2007-02-7 Automated pywikipediabot message

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 03:08, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

some people don't want to work (I don't speak about unemployment)

some people habitually don't want to work
some people have psychological problems with work and don't work
some people are habitual nonworkers but claim they are mentally ill to earn social benefits (even if they do so, some countries consider that as a mental problem), some humanists don't accept that
some people work on subjects society doesn't pay or recognize as work (this is in relation to others, judged by others) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:410D:D600:8C45:C97D:86A8:51F4 (talk) 08:48, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

if someone has physical problems isn't considered an indolent

if someone is extremely melancholic might not be considered as indolent

the "pure" nonworking indolent is either habitual, either for unknown reasons mentally ill (if the reasons are known he might have a logical - pathological excuse)

the fact we don't speak about something doesn't mean it doesn't exist!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:410D:D600:8C45:C97D:86A8:51F4 (talk) 08:39, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]