Talk:Kushano-Sasanian Kingdom

Tajikistan Mid‑importance

	Tajikistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tajikistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tajikistan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TajikistanWikipedia:WikiProject TajikistanTemplate:WikiProject TajikistanTajikistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Afghanistan Mid‑importance

	Afghanistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: History Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Central Asia Mid‑importance

	Asia portal Kushano-Sasanian Kingdom is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iran Mid‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pakistan Mid‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Pakistani history.

Spelling of "Sassanid"

Dear PHG, or other creator of this article,

I feel the word Sassanid is a mis-spelling. Mitchiner started this trend by spelling the word Sassanian and a lot of people have used Mitchiner and have thus managed to perpetuate this mistake. But most authoritative sources spell the name as Sasanian or Sasanid as the dynasty is named for Sasan. Let not Wikipedia perpetuate Mitchiner's mistake!

CoinIndia (talk) 12:38, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear CoinIndia,

you may well have a point here, though transcriptions of ancient names is a tricky business, and total consequence is rarely achieved. But I'd like to say that I've just read dr. Farrokhs's "Shadows in the desert", and he spells the name with two s's. Dr Farrokh is Iranian himself and goes very far to spell Sassanid and Parthian names according to modern Persian standards, so I feel that the spelling is generally well accepted. And Wikipedia's policy is to reflect standard spellings, even if the origin may be dubious. Sponsianus (talk) 21:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indo Sassind ??

I have been searching for books on this term and couldent find any ....
is Indo Sassind a Legitimate dynasty or a cooked up term by some user here
Moreover this article does not have a single reference since 2007.
Should this article be deleted then ??
Intothefire (talk) 08:36, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See Indo-Sasanid, Indo-Sassanids, Indo-Sasanian, Indo-Sassanians and most of all Indo-Sassanian Per Honor et Gloria ✍ 21:28, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Validity of "Indo"-Sassanids?

The article head misleadingly implies that the Indo-Sassanids "were a branch of the Sassanid Persians ", ie that they were differentiated from the Sassanid Persians proper, as opposed to just being another province in the Sassanid Empire. The list of rulers imply that there was a list of Indo-Sassanid rulers, but all the rulers listed are just the rulers of the Sassanid dynasty, who were the rulers of the entire Persian empire and not a separate branch in any way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.234.110.243 (talk) 20:24, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dates of Indo-Sassanid Rulers

They are mostly wrong... the main articles accessed by the links give totally different dates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrystomath2 (talk • contribs) 11:24, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading Map

The map includes the territories from the 7th century wars. They are striped, but they shouldn't be there at all. It doesn't have any description or legend. The four cities of Indo Sasanians are marked. It's the wrong map to use. 70.109.175.45 (talk) 23:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC) John Dee[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kushano-Sasanian Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050828050211/http://grifterrec.com/coins/kushanshah/kushanshah.html to http://www.grifterrec.com/coins/kushanshah/kushanshah.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:13, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]