Talk:Indira Gandhi International Airport/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Vincent60030 (talk · contribs) 06:10, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I suppose it has a potential to be a good article, but there's still in need of improvements.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
- There is still lack of references at the bottom few sections, especially with an unreferenced area tag
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Good!
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- Some images have captions that are not precise, such as an awkward caption 'thumb'. Also, there are too many images at the bottom half part of the article.
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Good try! My suggestions are to improve on references, provide suitable captions for the images used and try to reduce the images at the bottom half part of the article. :)
- Pass or Fail: