Talk:Indiana HB 1041

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Z1720 (talk) 23:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Indiana HB 1041, a law that bans trans girls from participating in school sports, was vetoed by Indiana Governor, Eric Holcomb, and then overridden three days later? Source: https://apnews.com/article/sports-indiana-government-and-politics-legislature-9256de6616bd71e6b11424fa4e2e260b
  • ALT0a: ... that Indiana HB 1041, a law that bans trans girls from participating in school sports, was vetoed and overridden in three days? Source: https://apnews.com/article/sports-indiana-government-and-politics-legislature-9256de6616bd71e6b11424fa4e2e260b
  • ALT0b: ... that Indiana HB 1041, a law that bans trans girls from participating in school sports, was passed over the Republican governor's veto?

Created by Moon motif (talk), ShreyasMinocha (talk), and RoguTheBest (talk). Nominated by JamieF (talk) at 23:08, 28 June 2022 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Article is long enough and was just barely new enough at the time of nomination (seven days). There is no picture so picture guidelines do not apply. Of the proposed hooks, I like ALT0a the best as it is concise and interesting. Article is free from plagiarism (Earwig's Copyvio Detector score 6.5%, violation unlikely). Hook is properly cited in this nomination, however the article uses the cite in a place that does not claim the bill was vetoed and overruled in four days. QPQ check turned up an empty list so I assume a QPQ is not required. JIP | Talk 15:22, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

• JIP Hi, I updated the article, and I realize now I had three days in the first hook, and four in the second (three is correct) I updated it in the hook and article, and cited it. This was my first DYK nomination, but I went today and reviewed QPQ: Template:Did you know nominations/Jerold F. Lucey. Thanks for your help, please let me know if you need anything else.

• @JIP: Redoing the ping. (@JamieF: You need a signature in the same edit for a ping to function.) Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:04, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
• The hook is properly cited in the article now. JIP | Talk 17:26, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
• Article looks OK for DYK now. JIP | Talk 17:28, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Correction

The claim that it was vetoed and overridden three days later is false. The bill was vetoed in March and overridden in May. Edknol (talk) 03:51, 27 July 2022 (UTC)