Talk:Indiana General Assembly/GA2

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
"The Senate and House of Representatives are subdivided into several committees"--is it really subdivided, as in each assembly member is a member of exactly one committee, or does it have a series of committee and subcommittee membership like congress? In detailing the incumbent officers, the article mixes past and present tense--standardize on one.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Good to see wikitables, and thanks for fixing the image tagging.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I made a few wording tweaks, but this arrived very ready for a GA review. Drop me a note when you fix the prose issues--you're within a whisker of a pass. Good job! ON HOLD for up to a week. Jclemens (talk) 01:30, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are no "sub-committees" as I understand it. There are about a two dozen different committees, and membership overlaps quite a bit. I have changed the wording to better reflect that. Subdivided was a poor description.
I have changed all the verb tenses to present. Perhaps they should be past tense though?

Let me know if there is anything more! Thanks for you review. Charles Edward 02:25, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]