Talk:Indian rhinoceros/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 15:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments

• 'Taxonomy' says 'The Indian rhinoceros is monotypic'. I think you should say "species", as the Javan rhino is in the same genus... readers may be unfamiliar with the concept of a "monotypic species" as we generally think of a species as, um, one thing.
  • Fixed

• 'Etymology' needs to say how Greek "ris" (should be "rhis" actually) can turn into "rhino" ... probably need to give the genitive case for clarity.
  • Fixed

• 'Evolution' is quite rightly summarized with a "main" link, but the cladogram should be repeated in this article (with its source).
  • Fixed

• Wouldn't the weights be more readable in tonnes, rather than kilos and pounds? (Tonnes have the advantage of coming in smaller numbers, and both metric and imperial varieties are almost the same, so they really don't need the clutter of conversion).
  • Fixed

• The current "precision" of weights is a bit off anyway: 1,599 – 1,608 kg would mean "all cows have the identical weight, within +/- 4.5 kg?! Sounds unlikely.
  • Fixed

• Populations would be more readable if sorted chronologically.
  • Fixed

• I don't think we need to advertise the "signature 2021 report, State of the Rhino", nor to give the acronym for the International Rhino Foundation.
  • Fixed

• 'Ecology' needs to wikilink megaherbivore somewhere. That would go well with the "group of four tigers ... killed a ... male", with the link that megaherbivores are (Arnie eat your heart out) hard to kill, and reported kills are rare.
  • Fixed

• 'Threats': not sure about the wording of "has caused large death of".
  • Fixed

• 'Conservation': suggest abbreviate to 'R. unicornis' as already introduced. Or just say Indian rhino, or indeed "it has".
  • Fixed

• 'Reintroduction' - would be helpful to add those to the range map. And maybe merge the short paragraphs.
  • I don't know how to make/edit maps.

• 'In captivity': again, merge short paras.
  • Fixed

• 'Cultural': amazing, I'd never noticed it on the Pashupati seal. Would certainly be worth including the image.
  • Fixed

Images

• The pics in 'Europe' overrun into the reflist. Suggest using a gallery to organise them horizontally. Both of them could do with dates in their captions, too.
  • Fixed

• The graph 'Population trend since 1910' indicates no source either here or on Commons? It's also gruesomely out of date compared to the figures at the top of 'Populations'. We probably need to redraw the thing using new data, and cite it.
  • Removed it
    • Very wise, it probably needs to be deleted from Commons.

• All the images other than the graph are plausibly licensed on Commons.
  • Noted

Sources

• Please move the Portals box away from the refs (or ditch it altogether, it's really hard to see why anybody would move to a portal when they've already arrived at the animal article they want).
  • Fixed

• Linnaeus seems to have lumped all the rhinoceroses into one species in [2], if my Latin is serving me correctly? This probably needs to be stated in the text. Actually it'd be nice to provide a snippet of his description, it's in very basic zoological Latin.
  • I think you're wrong; that's not what Google translate stated.
    • Ah, indeed. But he says '[Rhinoceros] unicornis ... cornu unico conico ... Habitat in Africa, India', and '[Rhinoceros] bicornis ... cornibus duobus cuneiformibus ... Habitat in India'. i.e. there are 2 species in India, one of them the African species, and the Indian species has two "wedge-shaped" horns, unlike the one "conical" horn of the African species. Extraordinary! This does I think need to be stated in the article. But I suppose we can argue that he was right about R. unicornis and a bit muddled about R. bicornis ...

• Why do we have a 2010 Wildlife Watch Group book in 'Further reading'?
  • Fixed

• '"Great Indian rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis)". ECOS Environmental Conservation Online System.' is a dead link.
  • Fixed

• 'Nepal Rhino Conservation' is a dead link.
  • Fixed

• 'Indian Rhinoceros page at nature.ca' just goes to the top of the website.
  • Fixed

• Why do we need a 2018 BBC 'Rhino census' link down here?
  • Fixed

• Why do we need a 2007 archive of an Arkive page?
  • Fixed

• [22] Jerdon is missing its page number(s).
  • Fixed

• What is "Karmakar,DHNS" in [25]? If it's an honorific, suggest we ditch it. Whatever it is, it's oddly formatted.
  • Fixed

• [31] is missing a page number, which seems to be p.38.
  • Fixed

• All the source links I followed were as indicated and clearly relevant to the claims made.
  • Noted

Summary

That's about it from me. Looking good, just a few minor things that should be quick to fix.

• I think I'm now done. 20 upper (talk) 19:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Almost there. Linnaeus (above) is actually a good deal more curious than I thought.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.