Talk:Indian community of London

Clean up

I removed some of the more blatant assertions which were either POV or impossible to find a reference for. This article needs substantial bulking and additional references before it even meets start class criteria. Copana2002 (talk) 22:45, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

Indian community of London → British Indian community of London — Or perhaps, more simply, British Indians in London. While it might seem obvious that this community is British Indian rather than simply Indian, I think it is important to stress that this community, British Indians, are predominantly British citizens, British-born, and have a dual British identity as well as their ancestral connection to India. The Celestial City (talk) 15:30, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

• Oppose It is not the place of an article title to make points (and arguably POV ones at that: "I think it is important to stress ..") about the subject matter. The proposed title is less correct than the existing one as not all the Indian community of London is British. The existing title is clear and unambiguous and is consistent with naming of similar articles elsewhere. While I sympathise with the sentiments of the proposer, I don't think this is how Wikipedia should determine the names of its articles. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 01:45, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
• Oppose. At least borderline WP:SOAP as Mattinbgn hints, and contrary to WP:PRECISION. Nothing to recommend it really. Andrewa (talk) 03:36, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

The idea is to improve accuracy, not to use Wikipedia as a platform for any ideas. If not all the members of this community are British, then certainly not all are Indian, at least other than of Indian ancestry. This move is simply to conform this article with the parent article, British Indian. The Celestial City (talk) 11:01, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

I hear what you're saying, but I still don't think it's consistent with policy. Your ideas of accuracy, or mine or anyone else's for that matter, are not the primary consideration here. We follow English usage. French toast, for example, is neither French nor toast. Andrewa (talk) 05:37, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Maybe you're right. Withdrawing the move. The Celestial City (talk) 21:08, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Indian community of London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131005001411/http://sacred-vision.com/divine-india/ to http://www.sacred-vision.com/divine-india/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)