Jump to content

Talk:Indian Premier League controversies

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

IPLgate

[edit]

Why is there no extended section on the recent controversy relating to Lalit Modi and Shashi Tharoor and all the related stuff? Its a very poor article. MikeLynch (talk) 06:20, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Title

[edit]

Wouldn't "Indian Premier League controversies" be a more natural title?--ukexpat (talk) 01:20, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@Ukexpat: I read you suggetion here about this article's title. I opened a discussion about move, you can vote below. Rock Stone Gold Castle (talk) 12:34, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_involving_the_Indian_Premier_League. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 19:49, 6 September 2014 (UTC).[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Controversies involving the Indian Premier League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:34, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 March 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Controversies involving the Indian Premier LeagueIndian Premier League controversies – The article mentions controversies in or related to IPL, so it will be appropriate to write it's title as I recommend. Rock Stone Gold Castle (talk) 12:32, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This article needs a grammar check

[edit]

Poor sentence formation and punctuation is evident in many parts of the article, notably in the ‘controversies’ section. 2405:201:800C:C0DA:6133:8CF3:4A2:4D4E (talk) 05:14, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]