Talk:Indian Navy amphibious vessel acquisition project

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / Asian / South Asia C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Issues

This article needs help. The heading is a generic one, "Multi-Role Support Vessel", where one might think that such a specific vessel exists, and this is going to discuss that vessel. But instead, it appears to be a type of vessel being sought in an acquisition program, specifically by the Indian Navy. For starters, the title should be changed, among some of the other issues I noted. - ^theWOLFchild 05:01, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What do you suggest? We already have an article on a topic like this: Indian MRCA competition. Something on those lines? Anir1uph | talk | contrib 12:30, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To start, I would suggest changing the name. That involves a page move (we don't just copy & paste). I am happy to do once we have a new name for the article. - ^theWOLFchild 21:19, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware of the page-move and page-history conservation rules :) We can simply use Indian MRCA competition as a template and rename the page to Indian Multi-Role Support Vessel or Indian Multi-Role Support Vessel competition. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 22:52, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How about Indian Navy MRSV Selection Program ? - ^theWOLFchild 01:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MRSV is not a highly searched term, not does it make it clear what the article is about. But if you are satisfied with it, then please make the page move. I have no problems either way. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 02:28, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We could go with Indian Navy Multi-Role Support Vessel Selection Program, if you don't think it's too long. - ^theWOLFchild 09:42, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 12:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be surprised if someone complains about "programme vs. program". But I'm fine with it. Thanks. - ^theWOLFchild 01:11, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One cannot complain about that. It is wiki-policy to have articles their local form of English. See Indian English. Any other issues?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Anir1uph (talk • contribs) 02:08:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, I'm fine with it. - ^theWOLFchild 17:51, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So, any more issues? Anir1uph | talk | contrib 18:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you're referring to the new title (with the local variant on spelling), then for the third time, I'm fine with it. As far as anything else related to the article, well I would have to go over the content again when I have some time. At a glance, I saw that it might need some improving. I see that the editor who created this page and added a lot of the original content has been indef'd. I also see you have since been recently contributing. I don't know if you have any big plans for this page, but if you do, I'm happy to help. On a side note, I filed this, at WP:AN, in regards to the old title. Cheers - ^theWOLFchild 19:07, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was asking if you have any other issues as you had placed a "multiple issues" tag on the article, and i assumed you had, well, multiple issues to discuss. But since there aren't any, i have now removed that tag. As per the topic at AN, i have redirected the only article linking to the old title to the new title, so you may use that page for writing a general article. I am no going to devote much time on this article, as it has enough info already, but will update it from time to time. Thanks! :) Anir1uph | talk | contrib 21:55, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, like I said... at a glance I had noticed a few issues, other than the title, and generally felt the article could use some improvement - hence the reason I placed the tag. I don't care if the tag is removed, it's not a big deal. The article is low priority for me, but when I have some time, I will give it some attention. If you're going to pop in from "time to time" as well, then I'm sure we'll have it fixed up sooner or later. Take care & Cheers - ^theWOLFchild 01:25, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move

@Anir1uph: - You didn't move the talk page. I'm gonna be out for a few hours, can you take care of it? Thanks - ^theWOLFchild 01:59, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand - the talk page is moved automatically when the article is moved. See Talk:Multi-Role Support Vessel. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 02:14, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tender issued

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-11-21/news/44326803_1_defence-ministry-defence-industry-tender Anir1uph | talk | contrib 19:06, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Change in the tender

The old reports were that India will buy a foreign design and then build the design at HSL. Those designs were Frech Mistral, Spain's Juan Carlos,etc

The latest reports though sound different. The contracts are given to Private companies now, and they have chosen to tie up with some Foreign companies. Nowhere does it mention that they are going to buy the foreign design. The article indicates more towards a new design which will be designed by the Private players with consultation with thier Foreign partners. So any Foreign Class of vessel can be omitted from this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.62.183.50 (talk) 07:35, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree with you. The new info only narrows down the list of foreign designers from the earlier six to the present three; it does not say that newly designed ships will be constructed. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 08:09, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Indian Navy Multi-Role Support Vessel programme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120217185025/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com:80/NAVY/Ships/Future/185-Indian-Aircraft-Carrier.html to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Ships/Future/185-Indian-Aircraft-Carrier.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:06, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About removing old information

I have removed the information regarding the last contenders and criteria for selection from the history section. As these information were old and not fit in the current page content. It would be taken mistakely that it about the current ref by the reader I ame Shears (talk) 07:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]