Talk:Indian Camp/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 01:27, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: One found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 01:31, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:32, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Prose is good, complies with essential details of MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Those that are on-line, OK, assume good faith for off-line sources, sufficiently referenced, no signs of OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Hemingway was on a train, returning from New York to Toronto, during Hadley's labor. Presumably Hadley is Hemingways' wife or lover but needs a little more explanation.  Done

• I'd just noticed that wasn't explained or linked, but now done. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 01:50, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   NPOV

2. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   No edit warring

3. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

4. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   One small point to be addressed. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:48, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

   Thanks for the quick response, I am happy to pass this as a GA. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 01:57, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

   Thanks! Truthkeeper88 (talk) 01:59, 6 March 2011 (UTC)