Talk:India national football team/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Royroydeb (talk · contribs) 06:48, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I will be reviewing this and put my comments soon. RRD (talk) 06:48, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Puffery: "was once considered one of the best teams in Asia," ,"considered to be the "golden era" of Indian football", "one of the best teams in Asia.", "India were still praised by fans and pundits" (the ref used also do not clearly say so)
WP:Weasel words: "many historians and pundits believe", "what is still considered the team's greatest result"

What is meant by various home stadiums must be explained, if not in the main then in the footnote.

As of this version of the page:

The early years section of history can be expanded. RRD (talk) 13:54, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The top scorer goals does not tally with the ref 3 given.

Biggest win and defeats are unsourced.
The ref 15 only speaks about the Colombo cup and other minor tournaments.
The ref 17 opens to a generic page and has no information about Neville D Souza's hat-trick.
The ref 25 does not mention that India's performance declined. It is a WP:Original Research
the ref 29 does not mention India's decline.
ref 42: is the author of the article of Hard Tackle referred as football pundit?
In results and schedule section, the future matches are unsourced.

No problem with images. But what about the logo? RRD (talk) 06:45, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will have a look later tonight. Give me a few days (4) to get going on it. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 23:38, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is Ok. I dont find any edit wars. RRD (talk) 07:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am now closing this review. This review has been for long and satisfactory response has not been received. RRD (talk) 16:54, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]