Talk:Independent woman

This page was proposed for deletion by TheSpecialUser (talk · contribs) on 25 July 2012 with the comment:
Looks like WP:OR and not written in a neutral way. This can have an article but this doesn't look encyclopedic
It was contested by Fayenatic london (talk · contribs) on 2012-07-31 with the comment:
article has sources and is a good enough starting point

Popular culture (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular cultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular culturePopular culture

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Red

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... I am a primary researcher for this topic. The information is from my own research. --Aimhigh3 (talk) 15:19, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably not a viable Wikipedia article, at least in its present form. It reads like an essay about a cultural phenomenon, not an encyclopedic presentation of the state of knowledge about a thing. The tone is expository, not factual. - Wikidemon (talk) 15:33, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As it happens, "own research" is not a good reason to keep things on Wikipedia, see WP:NOR and WP:V. Anyway, you improved the article after it was proposed for deletion, and it has potential. Please carry on developing it, citing reliable sources, and rewriting material in your own words. I've just realised that at the moment it's still pretty similar to the material at Stereotypes of African Americans in the United States, so it could be nominated at WP:AfD if you don't make it stand out fairly soon. – Fayenatic London 17:27, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it's better now, but keep working on it! – Fayenatic London 08:25, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah..seems better now.But still a lot of work to do :) TheStrike Σagle 08:31, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]