Talk:Independent Press Standards Organisation
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed merge with Recognition Panel
[edit]Appears to be a duplicate Happy Squirrel (talk) 14:26, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- No, it isn't. The Press Recognition Panel and IPSO are different organisations. I'm going to remove the merge templates as they are misleading. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
I have added a 'Criticism' section - otherwise this article is entirely one sided and mentions no criticisms concerning this contentious issue BobBadg (talk) 20:34, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Criticism deleted
[edit]I added a couple of sentences to the Criticism section yesterday, concerning the NUJ and its attitude to IPSO. These comments seemed noteworthy and well sourced. Within a few hours they had been deleted without explanation. I've put the comments back as they were. I'd be happy to have a discussion but isn't such deletion without explanation in itself worthy of comment.BobBadg (talk) 17:37, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class organization articles
- Unknown-importance organization articles
- WikiProject Organizations articles
- Start-Class Media articles
- Unknown-importance Media articles
- WikiProject Media articles
- Start-Class United Kingdom articles
- Unknown-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles