Talk:Inculturation

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by theology work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Additions

This article still needs more work, but for the time being I added some relevant historical information, which indicates that inculturation was not always ageeed upon or even consistently interpreted. I deleted the unsigned commentary as irrelevant to the subject here.--Ambrosius007 (talk) 14:10, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only Catholic?

Is anything going to be added about non-Catholic contextual theology? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.101.239 (talk) 13:02, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Current Use and liturgical variations

Should there be a discussion of Anglican Use, Zaire Use or other current variations of the Ordinary Form in this article? --Bruce Hall (talk) 15:22, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inculturation Between Christians?

It is a bit surprising to see references to the Latin Empire of Constantinople and to Pope Leo XIII's tolerance toward Eastern Christians. Is this really inculturation within the scope of the article? After all, the opening sentence of the article reads "Inculturation is a term used in Christianity, especially in the Roman Catholic Church, referring to the adaptation of the way Church teachings are presented to non-Christian cultures." Should these references be removed? --Tom Davis (talk) 00:04, 30 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk • contribs) [reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Contextualizing theology which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dai uso

The article Dainichi says that the word Xavier coined was Deusu, not Daiusu. Both articles have references. Which is right? --Error (talk) 16:47, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as you have fixed. Thanks. Caorongjin (talk) 07:49, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]