Talk:Incremental reading
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Proof?
[edit]Has any study been done to establish any empirical proof that this method actually works? If so it should be cited and mentioned in this article. Jtaylor100 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:48, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- I agree with this concern and have added a "third party" maintenance tag to the article. It relies far too heavily on the developer's own say-so and affiliated sources without sufficient independent expert sources to assess this approach. Regardless of its accuracy or lack thereof, the information needs a more diverse range of sources. GermanJoe (talk) 10:33, 3 January 2019 (UTC)