Talk:Inca technology
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 23 April 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Incan engineers to Inca technology. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 23 April 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 10:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Incan engineers → Inca technology – Apparently, the article isn't about any named engineers (possibly no names are known), and instead is about methods used, and some of those don't really seem like they would usually be described as "engineering", for instance the section on freeze-drying. "Inca technology" might be a closer match with some other articles such as Ancient Egyptian technology and Roman technology. I'm not sure about "Inca" vs. "Incan". It looks like there are more page titles with the adjective as "Inca" than with the adjective as "Incan". Wombat140 (talk) 09:16, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, I agree. Inca technology would be a better title.Smallchief (talk) 10:08, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support Seems like a no brainer.★Trekker (talk) 10:53, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.