Talk:Inbred strain
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jaltenb. Peer reviewers: D.Wojtaszek.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Why inbred strain should be the entry heading
[edit]I recently moved linear animal to inbred strain since I think the latter is the much more widely know and used term. Check out these numbers:
Google hits:
- 949 "linear animal"
- 163000 "inbred strain"
- 28 site:.edu "linear animal"
- 11500 site:.edu "inbred strain"
- 1 site:.ac.uk "linear animal"
- 150 site:.ac.uk "inbred strain"
Hope you agree. Best, Jasu 12:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi, normal siblings should have only 25% identical. Parents/son or daughter have about 50% identical. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bjr2008 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see the relevance to the 98% identical inbred strain after 20 generations. Siblings can be anywhere from 0 to 100% identical to one another. Nadiatalent (talk) 13:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC).
- Sorry to bring up such an old mistake, but statistically all full siblings should be on average 50% related and parents and offspring are 50% related, that being said, it is an average, it is possible for 100% shared and 0% sharedJaltenb (talk) 18:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Just letting people know I am adding in a few more headings for some other organisms that are relevant to inbred strainsJaltenb (talk) 21:17, 18 November 2017 (UTC)