Talk:Inappropriate Comedy

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

"Bombed at the box office"

According to Wikipedia's own definition of a box office bomb: "To earn this distinction, the film must also fail to earn more than the reported cost of its production, distribution and marketing by a wide margin." The cited articles call the film a flop, but only in comparison with other films in theaters at the time (which is unreliable - this film was independently produced/distributed and was shown on only a fraction of the screens that it's competitors were) and without referencing any information regarding the film's budget or profitability. Without knowing the film's budget it's impossible to know whether or not it was profitable, and therefore it can't legitimately be labeled as a flop by Wiki's own standards. Until more, reliable, accurate information is available, I'm removing the line about the film having "bombed at the box office." Zargabaath 17:49, 7 August 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zargabaath (talk • contribs)

I don't disagree, but considering how many known actors appear in the film--presumably only for the paycheck--I think it's safe to assume it hasn't recouped what it paid its actors, let alone its total production costs. 50.72.166.225 (talk) 00:31, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A (lots of known actors) + B (must have cost a lot) = C (bombed). Please see WPSYN - SummerPhD (talk) 04:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, not quite. Ocean's Eleven had A (lots of known actors) and therefore B (must have cost a lot), but no one would consider that C (a bomb). Part of the potential problem is we're making assumptions about both its cost and its revenues. We assume the cast took big paydays up front, but for all we know that clown convinced them to work for a percentage of the box office and/or home video gross. We're assuming it made very little money, but that gross is only box office. For all we know, it made some money with home video/streaming/digital downloads. After all, this guy made his nut selling crap on TV. Maybe enough people were dumb enough to buy this that it actually recouped its cost. We just don't know for sure. 50.72.166.225 (talk) 03:03, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Were the raciest scene's done with other actors or the public?

Were the raciest scenes where hes a driving instructor or even When he was offering free one way boat rides real?@ I eat pink tacos (talk) 04:28, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]