Talk:In the Wake of Separation

Canada: Music Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music.

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Untitled

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was leave (nomination withdrawn). Andrewa 20:52, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reasons for proposed move

~~In the Wake of Separation → In the Wake of Seperation (Discuss)~~: This is the correct title for the album, as shown on numerous sources. Shortly after I created the article, someone 'corrected' the spelling. Being rather tired, I assumed it my mistake, and moved the page to the 'correct' spelling. A few moments later, I realised that they were mistaken, and I couldn't move it back. Sources are the band's site and RockDetector — J Milburn 17:15, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Entry of 9/10 news has proper spelling. Also, other cited site has typo, but notice the real spelling illustrated on album's cover-art. Plus, okay on Amazon's catalog page. Ricksy 19:50, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. I do not understand the rationale behind this move request. All the images I can find of the album cover spell the word "Separation"; even the group's web page uses that spelling; so why are you trying to move it to "seperation"? --SigPig 04:30, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, you are right. I am a fool, this should stay where it is. As I say, I was really tired when I did this, I can't have been paying attention to anything. How do I remove this? Or do we just wait for an admin to come and say that it can stay where it is? J Milburn 11:17, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Fair use rationale for Image:ThineEyesBleed-InTheWakeOfSeparation.jpg

Image:ThineEyesBleed-InTheWakeOfSeparation.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]