Talk:In the Library with the Lead Pipe

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 January 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by Randykitty (talk · contribs) on 6 January 2020.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

I won't put a "notability" tag on this article, given that it was kept at AfD. However, I do want to note that I couldn't disagree more with that outcome (that's not a criticism of the closer, but of the "keep" !votes). The article completely fails either WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. It is not indexed in selective databases (only in databases that are selective in the sense that they collect anything library-related, but unselective in the sense that within their field, they include anything (with the possible exception of evidently predatory journals - I didn't check that). Neither is the handful of citations to articles that appeared in this journal sufficient to meet NJournals#2 (not by far). I'm delisting this article from my watchlist, but thought it good to make editors here aware that this article is problematic and what exactly those problems are. --Randykitty (talk) 18:40, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]