Talk:In the Company of a Poet

In the Company of a Poet has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 3, 2022. (Reviewed version).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:In the Company of a Poet/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Reviewer: Kavyansh.Singh (talk · contribs) 04:08, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator: Nicholas Michael Halim (talk · contribs) at 08:19, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Comments

Prose

containing her extensive interview — I'd remove 'extensive'
with the Indian filmmaker, lyricist, and poet Gulzar. — suggesting "with Gulzar, an Indian filmmaker, lyricist, and poet."
Dina, British India (now Pakistan) — missing MOS:GEOCOMMA (both in the lead and in the prose)
"Top 10 in Indian Non-fiction Books" — I'd remove the quotes
and the journalist — remove 'the'
lyricist, poet and screenwriter — comma after 'poet'
"Summary" — Shouldn't the title be "Synopsis". I am not sure, though.
into a Sikh family — "in a Sikh family"
"now Pakistan" in lead v. "(present-day Pakistan)" in prose. — suggesting to be consistent.
and had married for three times (producing a son and two daughters from a first marriage with Raaj) — remove 'for', and replace 'producing' with 'having'
who later become — "who later became"
Gulzar says to Kabir — convert to past tense
as his mother was died — remove 'was'
after giving birth to him — as we have mentioned that Gulzar is the only child, 'to him' could be removed.
how he wrote his first poet — first poet?
when he was at the age of ten — should be "at age ten"
and later starts — "and later started"
Gulzar married to the actress — remove 'to the'
I know that summary/synopsis usually doesn't require a citation, but as ~~most~~ all of this is Gulzar's biography, can we get a source at the end verifying everything? Upto you though.
Movie Mahal — Is 'Movie' part of the title? If not, it should not be in italics.
"Nasreen Munni Kabir" is repeated many times. Can just write "Kabir" for her.
Nasreen Munni Kabir asked for help from the journalist Khalid Mohamed to invite people who had significantly involved in the industry. — Odd wording. Specify: which indistry? "who had significantly involved in the" is missing "been". Also, who are characterized as being "significantly" involved? What is significant?
on Pali Hill — specify the city.
this time on — remove 'this time'
the playback singer — I'd remove 'the'
Kabir recounted he came up insightful information about the singer — odd phrasing. Who is "he" here? Also, it is missing a few words.

@Nicholas Michael Halim – I'll stop here and continue with it later. We could really get some dedicated copy-editing. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:18, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavyansh.Singh: Done. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 09:31, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

from their previous rendezvous — rephrase 'rendezvous'
"[preposterously] as this might sound", "no matter how overly dramatic the whole might seem to him" — we will need citations immediately after these quotes
once more after she arriving in India. — replace "arriving" with "arrives"
In the end of 2010, — "In late 2010,"
so they avoid — start as a new sentence, and remove 'so'
"I also believed that even if we were to revisit events that were already known, [Gulzar] would shed new light on them from the perspective of who he is today." — we will need citations immediately after the quote
at his office — specify Gulzar
"If you haven't read any of the books centered on Gulzar yet, this one—though not the best of the lot—could still be your pick!" — we will need citations immediately after the quote
The Hindustan Times' Deepa Gahlot — "The Hindustan Times' journalist(??) Deepa Gahlot "
"flips from films to individuals without a pause, from people to poetry with the finesse of a trapeze artiste" — we will need citations immediately after the quote
The table needs a caption, preferably using the {{sronly}} template.

Images

Images can take ALT text
Images, including the non-free-one are fine.

References

Can link The Hindu and Rupa Publications in all citations.

That is it. Putting on hold. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavyansh.Singh: Done. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 10:18, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Passing. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.