Talk:In God's Name

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Catholicism Low‑importance

In God's Name is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Perhaps this page should be deleted. The link in the redirect is no longer working, and the "In God's Name" title could be used for more likely reasons, such as the TV special on CBS. Stolee (talk) 03:50, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the section Another Version, the link to Robert Hutchinson refers to the wrong author of the same name. Compare books by author Robert Hutchinson at Amazon (https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_book_1?ie=UTF8&text=Robert+Hutchison&search-alias=books&field-author=Robert+Hutchison&sort=relevancerank) with Robert J. Hutchinson at Amazon (https://www.amazon.com/Robert-J.-Hutchinson/e/B001H9PT4A/ref=dp_byline_cont_book_1). There is no wikipedia entry for the correct author. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.165.72.208 (talk) 22:56, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Any book review shall be imaprtial insight into the book content. Here is just given an opininon of anonymous person(s) about Yallop's work.--71.178.106.120 (talk) 22:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the above, here are some editorials worth of reading:

Editorial Reviews

Denounced by the Vatican... Acclaimed around the world... Vindicated by new evidence... Winner of the 1985 Crime writers' Gold Dagger Award for best non-fiction... Over 5,000,000 copies sold. -- From the Publisher

"Faniciful and absurd" - The Vatican

"His book has two strengths. It brings up to date and tells well the story of how the Vatican has conducted its finacial affairs. The portayal of hitherto little-known John Paul I is also excellently done... an engrossing and disturbing book. It reflects no credit on the Vatican that its spokesmen affect to view the charges with contempt and ignore the questions raised" - The Economist

"A thriller without an ending... he has surely proved that there is a case to answer" - The Guardian

"A vast amount of first class evidence... Read the book. Weigh the evidence. Make your own judgement" - Morris West -- From the Publisher — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.106.120 (talk) 01:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Future update and inclusion of further material

I read this book a few months ago, and it builds a very compelling, well-researched and well-supported case. I think it deserves more detail in the article and I'm prepared to do that, but I need to re-read the book and work up some notes to flesh out the article's content. I'm happy to have any interested editors review all changes I make for bias, because I freely admit that I don't find any reason to question most of his assertions made about the Vatican, and I think it presents a darker side that they would rather deny and which people need to be made aware of. However it's going to take me some time to finish the book I'm busy with right now (Victor Hugo's Les Misèrables, which at 1200-odd pages is no small undertaking), but after that I'll come back to this article and work on it.

Regarding proposed deletion: absolutely OPPOSED! If anyone goes ahead and deletes it anyway, I will simply restore it, so don't bother.

Thanks for your understanding. Cadar (talk) 18:17, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]