This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
What is the importance of "The book drew a critical review from James E. McWilliams"? I am sure lots of books and articles get lots of critical reviews, but I am unsure why this deserves mention. There must be other reviews out there and I don't understand why this one was singled out. Who is J. McWilliams and who cares (my apologies) about the Texas Observer? This seems very much like a personal plug to me. Receptacle (talk) 23:04, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Receiving a critical review is not really news, especially for a #1 bestseller. The mention draws too munch undeserved attention to the review and not the book, which is supposed to be the subject of this article. I removed the mention from the main text and added the link to the External Links section if anyone's interested. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs)08:57, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]