Talk:In-A-Gadda-Da-Leela

Animation: American / Television / Futurama Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Futurama task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Infosphere copy?

I dunno, it just seems to me that a lot of the text of this article is almost a direct copy from the corresponding Infosphere article. We are not against our content being copied and used, we just assume some credit, like a link. The external link does not describe that it is where the content came from, by the way. --Svip ^pong 23:32, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm no lawyer, but Wikipedia comes with a 'contract' saying that -it's- content can be spread to the winds (I am paraphrasing here) freely. What does the Infosphere website say? Heck, if there's trouble just rewrite the thing here. Lots42 (talk) 05:58, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lost reference

a joke made on the comedy central blog was interpreted here as real so i removed it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.238.117.232 (talk) 23:25, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Twilight Zone reference?

This episode twist seems to draw straight from Rod Serling's I Shot an Arrow into the Air Twilight Zone. Thoughts?

A lot of stories are like a lot of other stories. Not noteable unless someone from the show mentions it. Lots42 (talk) 05:59, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

Can someone please rewrite the plot in this article? It is horribly written. Sureiyaa (talk) 03:40, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seems okay to me. What specifically is wrong with it? Lots42 (talk) 05:57, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to have been rewritten. It was much worse beforeSureiyaa (talk) 17:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Star Trek film reference

The first Star Trek film was about an old satellite called Voyager 6 that encountered an alien entity and was altered before returning to Earth, which it almost destroyed. On the satellite's hull, the words "Voyager 6" were damaged in such a way that they appeared to say "V-GER", so the satellite took that as its name.

Now, I know that V-GINY was a reference to V-GER. You all know it too. But can any of us provide any evidence of it, so we can put it in the "Cultural References" section? 86.154.142.5 (talk) 22:06, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on In-A-Gadda-Da-Leela. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100810175104/http://www.tv.com/futurama/in-a-gadda-da-leela/episode/1344296/trivia.html to http://www.tv.com/futurama/in-a-gadda-da-leela/episode/1344296/trivia.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]