Talk:Improver Corp v Remington Consumer Product Ltd
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Out of date?
[edit]It's my understanding that this set of questions has now been (largely?) superseded by the judgement given in the Kirin Amgen case. Should this page mention this and suggest that it relates to a legal test that is now of more 'historical' than practical interest82.211.95.178 13:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- I've tried to do this, adding in a quote from Kirin-Amgen on the subject Tt225 (talk) 11:54, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Actavis update
[edit]This should be updated in light of Actavis v Eli Lilley — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2406:E006:2EB:9401:D9F2:1769:AA69:9C72 (talk) 11:25, 3 March 2019 (UTC)