Jump to content

Talk:Impossible Is Nothing (Iggy Azalea song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Azealia911 (talk · contribs) 11:14, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Review to come soon, looks good! Azealia911 talk 11:14, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, looking forward! CoolMarc 12:14, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

General

[edit]
  • Some MoS:DASH violations in reference titles.
Fixed them for you Azealia911 talk
Thanks so much CoolMarc 08:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • For the writer field, changes Azalea's credit to an unlinked 'Azalea'
I'm not confusing them, it just seems unnecessary to use a linked version of her full name when its already listed in the infobox. Azealia911 talk
Per WP:OLINK links may be repeated for reader understanding and accessibility reasons, unlike prose and track listings the Infobox should be as clear and accessible as possible. CoolMarc 08:34, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove the "Recorded" field altogether, it can be listed in a less crowded way in the credits section
  • Unlink the following: 'beat', 'percussion instrument', 'chimes', 'glockenspiel', 'empowerment', 'underdog'.
  • Why is there a sentence talking about a tour that the song was not a part of? Same with Reclassified? That strikes me as really odd.
  • It was a promo single for the album that was ironically not included in the reissue nor ever performed live by Azalea. It's interesting facts about the song's aftermath and not odd in my opinion. The reader would not know this without this sentence. CoolMarc 07:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you really want to include it, fine, but you need better sources. The ones provided don't justify the claim, they mention nothing about the song not being included on the tour/album. Especially in the case of the tour review, she could have just not performed the song on that particular date, hence it not being mentioned and the claim then constituting WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. Azealia911 talk
Will remove it then... CoolMarc 08:37, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Background and release

[edit]
  • Unlink Iggy Azalea, interpolation and pre-order

Composition

[edit]
  • Add "that runs for a duration of three minutes and ten seconds" to the end of "hip hop song"
  • What does "sparkle-like" mean?
  • "Aspirational in its lyrics" needs rewording
  • The Quietus should be in italics

Critical reception

[edit]
  • "named it a highlight" → "deemed it a highlight"
  • PopMatters should be in italics

Track listing

[edit]
  • I'd advise removing this section altogether, it's quite redundant. A track listing should generally only be used at a very minimum if there are at least two tracks in a single (EG. an explicit and clean version of the same song), just one track shouldn't really require one.

Credits and personnel

[edit]
  • Move the reference sentence to the opening of the section.
  • Like I said in my comments of the infobox, move the recording studio information here.
  • Link the first appearance of the relevant positions, EG. [[Songwriter|writer]]

Charts

[edit]
  • Add |+ Weekly charts to the table

References

[edit]
  • #4 — [[MOBO Awards]] → [[MOBO Awards|MOBO]]
  • #8 — Needs an accessdate
Yes it does, archivedate shows when the link was archived, accessdate shows when the reference was accessed. I could use a wayback link from last year but the accessdate would still be today, while the archive date would be something like July 1, 2014. Azealia911 talk
 Done CoolMarc 09:03, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • #11 — Music Times shouldn't be in italics
  • #12 — Drowned in Sound should be in italics
  • #22 — The Quietus should be in italics
  • #34 — PopMatters should be in italics
[edit]
  • Is the SoundCloud link her official SoundCloud?
  • Status: On-hold for seven days while improvements are made.

Good luck Azealia911 talk 19:55, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Azealia911 thank you for the review. I've replied above! CoolMarc 07:42, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Replied with further comments. Azealia911 talk 08:08, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Azealia911 I've addressed your further comments above. Thank you. CoolMarc 09:09, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Passing Azealia911 talk 10:19, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]