Jump to content

Talk:Implementation Force

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


August 1995 probably not date of first shots fired by IFOR

[edit]

I think that the date (Aug 1995) that IFOR fired its first shots is obviously wrong - this applies to UNPROFOR and not IFOR (mission commenced Dec 1995).

disambiguate IFOR

[edit]

Per two recent changes at history of the page "IFOR", should we make IFOR a disambiguation page? I had a look at Special:Whatlinkshere/IFOR, and none of them seemed to refer to the other meaning, the one that is now in the hatnote, so I reverted it, but I'm still opening the discussion since it could still be somewhat ambiguous. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 11:20, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think DAB is needed at this point, though creating IFOR (disambiguation) might be a good idea. But I am not yet convinced that the IFOR article will ever survive. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 11:10, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The current solution - mutual hatnotes from/to Implementation_Force_(IFOR) and International Fellowship of Reconciliation; plus a redirect from IFOR to Implementation_Force_(IFOR) - seems fine, for now. In general, I think that in the least doubt about the primary topic we better use the acronym's page has a disambiguation (less harm in a occassional extra click than in not finding a page as easily), so maiking it a DAB page wouldn't hur either. - Nabla (talk) 01:18, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accountability

[edit]

Opening sentence of Background section begins:

"NATO was accountable for carrying out the Dayton Peace Accords."

For this sentence to convey meaning there must be a body to whom NATO was accountable, but such a body is not mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.97.25 (talk) 06:26, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It would have been the UN. I've added a link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.173.52 (talk) 09:13, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Implementation Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Implementation Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Implementation Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Implementation_Force&oldid=1218650724"