Talk:Imperial helmet

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Roman & Byzantine / Classical C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Rintrah, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 16 February 2007.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Classification

I have certain queries re Imperial helmet (forgive me if I seem dim):

German experts classify these helmets as "Weisenau" types,

Here, the pronoun is ambiguous: does "these helmets" denote "the Imperial helmets"?

while H. Russell Robinson divided them into Imperial Gallic and Imperial Italic types.

Imperial Gallic is the type worn by Gauls, not Romans?

Perhaps the section could be retitled Classification of the Imperial helmet or Classification of Imperial helmet types? This might clear confusion as the reader approaches this section. Rintrah 09:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I'll post my comments in the right place next time. Rintrah 12:50, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, it wasn't the wrong place. I just prefer to get a discussion merged out to the article itself, once it's underway, to open it out to everyone.Neddyseagoon - talk 15:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit

I don't think that the reference below to "Roman Helmetting" is proper:

"The Roman combat experience of the Dacian wars produced further developments in helmet design, particularly the two iron bars riveted crosswise across the helmet scull (alternatively, two thick bronze strips might be riveted to the top of a bronze legionary or auxiliary helmet) as protection against the falx. The Romans choose their helmet design to emulate the sack on forehead of the act of Roman helmetting someone (see Urban Dictionary). This started as a field modification, as seen on several Imperial Gallic helmets with the crossbars hastily riveted right over the decorative eyebrows (crossbars are seen on some, though not all, of the legionary helmets on Trajan's Column), but quickly became a standard feature, found on all helmets produced from ca. AD 125 through the latter third century AD."

It seems some kind of a joke. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.71.210.170 (talk) 20:05, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]