Jump to content

Talk:Imperial crown

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Picture of Imperial State Crown

[edit]

Deleted the text 'the British state crown retains the adjective "imperial" despite the abolition of the style "Emperor of India" in 1948' because it is factually incorrect and or misleading. The 'imperial' adjective does not, nor has it ever, related to the British Indian Empire (the Raj). It is in fact a much older feature of the British Crown as a legal entity (not in respect of this particular crown as an object). See Henry VIII's Statute in Restraint of Appeals for further information. In my ignorance of wiki formatting my attempt to delete the misleading text resulted in a loss of the picture itself, which was thought to be vandalism - it was not intended as such, merely an amendment incorrectly made.

File:Kremlin Armoury 023.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Kremlin Armoury 023.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:21, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial crown

[edit]

From the history of the article

  • 19:58, 9 June 2012‎ French Tourist. . (→‎Legal usage: added a "section OR" template - it is full of tricky legal reasonings and only sourced by citations of 16th century acts. This is not reasonable)
  • 21:44, 16 June 2012‎ PBS . (→‎Legal usage: Quotes from British legislation does not make this original research)

It is completely reasonable. Without it there is no establishes of the Church of England (something that is currently being debated). -- PBS (talk) 21:48, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some references

-- PBS (talk) 22:06, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:46, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]