Talk:Imperial Life in the Emerald City

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Article reads slightly as opinion, should be toned down, I think. Cumulus (talk) 06:17, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Critical Analysis?

Surely, there must have been some critical analysis of this book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.69.241.220 (talk) 14:40, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]