Talk:Imperator torosus/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (talk · contribs) 11:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

rev Rcej (Robert) – talk 11:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice job! Just three issues:

May we have a mycobox?

added by Sasata Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:17, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The lede sentence "Cooking has made it safe to eat on some occasions, yet still likely to lead to gastrointestinal symptoms on others." reads confusingly ambiguous. Let's clarify ;)

tweaked - is that ok? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:17, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the Toxicity section, "In a 1994 study, researchers Ulrich Kiwitt and Hartmut Laatsch looked for antabuse-like compound coprine content in Boletus luridus, which had been suspected of inducing antabuse-like reactions with alcohol, and similar species, and found none in the historical suspect but did find indications for it in Boletus torosus." Let's also state the layman meaning of antabuse-like reactions with alcohol there; and for some reason, the use of historical suspect reads a bit off target from "1994 study [of] ... Boletus luridus". -- Rcej (Robert) – talk 05:26, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aaaww, I liked "historical suspect" as it was a bit more engaging than writing out B. luridus again....~~am figuring how to slot something in~~ tried slotting an explanatory sentence in Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:59, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

lol...I won't get sticky over it! I ce'd to "suspect species", though, just to fulfill my inner control freak! Good job :) -- Rcej (Robert) – talk 04:38, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Results of review

GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Boletus torosus passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: Pass