Talk:Impact One Night Only

	Impact One Night Only is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 17 February 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to TNA One Night Only. The result of the discussion was not moved.

In Your House

In what way is this similar to In Your House? Wikipedia is an encylopedia, not a fan site. Things can exist on their own terms without using WWE as a point of reference, especially when it's unexplained or tangential. Tony2Times (talk) 03:15, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think thats similar because One Night Only is a series of monthly ppvs, like IYH, but taped.--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Each individual PPV.

Are we going to end up making pages for each of the one night only PPV's? or just leave it like that? --Kevmicester2000 (talk) 01:02, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TNA mentioned the X-Travaganza on iMpact, but didnt really build to it. Who knows what they'll do with the others. If they deserve a page via storylines like the other PPVs, give them one. If not, dont. I'd assume if TNA keeps this same format; all Knockdown, all X-Travaganza, should be given their own collective page.

Also, maybe put X-TRavaganza, 2013World Cup, & Hardcore Justice2013 in with their regular pages. 24.24.231.104 (talk) 22:57, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Responsibilities

The history of this article is littered with additions that don't reference a verifiable reliable source and deletions without an accurate edit summary, especially by editors who are not logged in. Both the additions and the deletions are contrary to Wikipedia policies and procedures. Please stop. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 19:37, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on TNA One Night Only. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131016144459/http://www.impactwrestling.com:80/ppv/Oct-20-Bound-For-Glory to http://www.impactwrestling.com/ppv/Oct-20-Bound-For-Glory

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:29, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikitable vs. {{Pro wrestling results table}}?

Any reason why, after 2014, Wikitable is used for results instead of the much easier Template:Pro wrestling results table? I might convert the post-2014 wikitables to results tables in my free time. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 02:47, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Impact One Night Only. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page split

This page is current way over the limits from WP:SPLIT and really should be split because edits are very slow. As the days go on its only going to get worse and worse. My suggestion would be to convert this into a by year page. On this page we leave the lead and as we get to the years we create a chart instead. If there are no objections I will do the work hopefully later in the week. - Galatz ^Talk 15:00, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So would the results would be split into individual pages, or be removed entirely, à la List of ICW events? JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:37, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The individually years would be more like Halloween Havoc, but rather than each year's events, it will be Impact One Night Only (2013) and then it will have all the results from 2013. This page would become more like List of ICW events and would then link to the results on the individual year pages. - Galatz ^Talk 15:41, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move page Impact One Night Only to already existing redirected page TNA One Night Only 16 January 2024

Move page Impact One Night Only to already existing redirected page TNA One Night Only due to the name of the company Impact Wrestling being reverted back to TNA Wrestling aka Total Nonstop Action Wrestling (TNA). 2600:1004:B238:50C3:0:C:8CA3:3101 (talk) 17:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 February 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. No explicit support or oppose rationale in the discussion. – robertsky (talk) 13:08, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Impact One Night Only → TNA One Night Only – Impact Wrestling has reverted back to the name Total Nonstop Action Wrestling. Fixer88 (talk) 17:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Bensci54 (talk) 17:47, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: These events were in the past. Is "Impact" the name most of them used at the time? We should be careful about going back and retroactively changing the names of events in the past. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 00:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was known as "TNA One Night Only" for four years, and "Impact One Night Only" for three. A decent case could be made to move to either name, but I agree the 2024 rename of Impact Wrestling is irrelevant in deciding which. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Professional wrestling has been notified of this discussion. Bensci54 (talk) 17:47, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The rash of recent Impact —> TNA moves were based on the rationale that our article titles should mirror the subject's marketing strategy at any given moment. This goes completely contrary to policy, which was ignored in the discussion. Gaming local consensus to contravene policy is a terrible look for the project. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 22:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are there any moves in particular that concern you? I do see some discussion of "common name" versus "official name" in the RM, RMTR and MR discussions of Total Nonstop Action Wrestling, although I agree that most of the comments were about the official name. My impression is that the "Impact" name may not have been especially popular, so some people were calling it TNA even when it was officially Impact, and when the official name changed back, there wasn't much resistance to dropping "Impact". I could be wrong though. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 23:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are correct. Indeed, that people never stopped calling the company TNA accounting to their own research was one of the reasons cited for reverting to that name. (The other major one being the decade and a half of shows in the archive with the TNA name.) As for the idea that updating the names to somehow goes against policy, that's wrong, as WP:NAMECHANGES is policy, based on the fact that readers are more likely going to look for the current name than any last name.

As for the proposed move, it could go either way, because this isn't an article about a single event. We wouldn't rename a single PPV/monthly special that was held under the Impact name for that given year (though I can't think of any that need it), but the overall article for an annual event with the same name every year that's still ongoing should probably use the current name. This one, however, is for a historical series of pretaped PPVs where both names were used for almost equal periods of time. So I'm going to defer my !vote. oknazevad (talk) 01:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.