Talk:Immortal Losing Game

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 May 2011. The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn.

Is adding notes to the moves 'original research' or simply 'providing context'? Because I think it might help to add more notes to the game score because it will help people better understand what is happening. --I 14:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it should be OK. -- Fred-Jn 22:42, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References?

I cannot find any reliable source of this game being called the "Immortal losing game". I can only find it on the chess site http://www.onlychess.com/main.php?page=immortal_losinggame and it seems to have been copied directly from Wikipedia.

Also, you cannot use the entry from Answers.com as a reference, because it is a Wikipedia mirror. Fred-Jn 22:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not great but something as it's in the title ChessCreator (talk) 16:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not great at all, as the "titles" on that site tend to be puns made up by the administrators.70.22.235.193 (talk) 04:30, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]