Talk:Image Channel

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Nepal

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Television: Stations

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Notability

This article has no reliable sources that attest to its notability, and the only reaction to my recent tagging of it for a lack of notability would seem to be an attempt to make the problem go away by removing the tag, and calling it vandalism, then running to complain when the tag was restored.

I can find nothing that looks like a reliable source for this channel. AFAICS, it operates as an on-line and satellite service (many satellite channels are not notable), has zero GNEWS hits, and all G-HITS look like self publicity.

Unless somebody finds some reliable sources, I intend to take this to AfD shortly. Mayalld (talk) 15:49, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]