Talk:Illness-Wellness Continuum

	This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This redirect was accepted on 5 September 2014 by reviewer Coin945 (talk · contribs).

Medicine

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Fbell74 (talk · contribs) has been paid by John Travis.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

COI

Please note: This is an article for which I was approached to edit and received a financial consideration for doing so.Fbell74 (talk) 06:38, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

aapparentcopyvio

" While standard medicine (see "Treatment Paradigm"), typically treats injuries, disabilities, and symptoms, " There is no section in this article called "Treatment Paradigm," so it appears from the internal evidence that this paragraph at least has been copied from an outside source. DGG ( talk ) 03:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DGG ( talk ) - sorry, I just noticed this post. Here, I think what may have happened is that content that was previously included in the John Travis article was moved into its own space. The wording would have related to content that was mentioned earlier in the original John Travis article. But when the Illness-Wellness Continuum text appeared in its own space, the writing wasn't corrected, so it ended up referring to something that wasn't actually in the article. I can rewrite this though -Fbell74 (talk) 09:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Other comments: "echoes the views of the WHO" is taken from a non authoritative textbook. And what does it mean? That this copied the view previous expresses, that they copied it from Travis, that that the both said more or less the same thing. I think that phrase has to go, everywhere it is found. This is an attempt at notability from having the same vague idea.

Book citations: I can not tell if these arej ust mentions. I think we need exact page ranges,. DGG ( talk ) 13:52, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In that example I was saying that both WHO and Travis were in agreement about wellness. The source was to support this. This is a link to the page where it's mentioned. I'll have a go at addressing the 'echoes the views of' type content (as well as finding the page ranges Fbell74 (talk) 06:44, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And the views expressed in various WHO documents are in accord with the views of millions of other people also. Do we include in the bio of every notable physician thattheir viewsarethe same as the WHO? This is pure puffery., whatever the source. DGG ( talk ) 04:17, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When I originally included this it was from the perspective that wellness might be considered outside the mainstream, so including support from the WHO was to support its acceptance as a concept by established organisations. But, I've taken out these mentions now. Fbell74 (talk) 07:00, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]